<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for In Genre</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ingenre.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ingenre.com</link>
	<description>Fantasy, horror, sci-fi - comics, movies, tv shows, video games - all this and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 07:42:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Captain Z Discusses D&amp;D 5th Edition by Merin</title>
		<link>http://ingenre.com/2012/01/captain-z-discusses-dd-5th-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-819</link>
		<dc:creator>Merin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 07:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ingenre.com/?p=5039#comment-819</guid>
		<description>Obsidian still hasn&#039;t lived down KotOR 2 in the eyes of many gamers.  Some of whom have never even played KotOR2.

We&#039;ll see how DA3 does, but DA2 has really turned people off to BioWare as a whole.

There&#039;s a cottage industry of remaking old versions of D&amp;D out there now, giving new material to those who cherish a previous edition.  WotC has changed their DDI and 4E so rapidly that the general complaint on their forums is that you can&#039;t trust what they offer today will resemble what they offer in 6 months.

Somehow the new D&amp;D could be some great unifying force.  But I doubt it.  Not only are the various editions of D&amp;D vastly different, the fandom has decidedly been split strongly in twain (as it was back in 2000 with 3E) and most of those who left will never, ever come back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obsidian still hasn&#8217;t lived down KotOR 2 in the eyes of many gamers.  Some of whom have never even played KotOR2.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll see how DA3 does, but DA2 has really turned people off to BioWare as a whole.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a cottage industry of remaking old versions of D&#038;D out there now, giving new material to those who cherish a previous edition.  WotC has changed their DDI and 4E so rapidly that the general complaint on their forums is that you can&#8217;t trust what they offer today will resemble what they offer in 6 months.</p>
<p>Somehow the new D&#038;D could be some great unifying force.  But I doubt it.  Not only are the various editions of D&#038;D vastly different, the fandom has decidedly been split strongly in twain (as it was back in 2000 with 3E) and most of those who left will never, ever come back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Captain Z Discusses D&amp;D 5th Edition by Captain Z</title>
		<link>http://ingenre.com/2012/01/captain-z-discusses-dd-5th-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-818</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ingenre.com/?p=5039#comment-818</guid>
		<description>Merin, you&#039;d be surprised what a great system can do. A truly great game will save D&amp;D for years to come. It&#039;s the same principle as when any other franchise goes cold for years and suddenly gets hot again. If the product is amazing, the old and new fans will flock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Merin, you&#8217;d be surprised what a great system can do. A truly great game will save D&amp;D for years to come. It&#8217;s the same principle as when any other franchise goes cold for years and suddenly gets hot again. If the product is amazing, the old and new fans will flock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Captain Z Discusses D&amp;D 5th Edition by Merin</title>
		<link>http://ingenre.com/2012/01/captain-z-discusses-dd-5th-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-817</link>
		<dc:creator>Merin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 05:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ingenre.com/?p=5039#comment-817</guid>
		<description>Spoke to several Pathfinder players tonight and got a resounding &quot;No!&quot; to whether or not WotC could win them back.
So, yeah, wasted effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spoke to several Pathfinder players tonight and got a resounding &#8220;No!&#8221; to whether or not WotC could win them back.<br />
So, yeah, wasted effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Captain Z Discusses D&amp;D 5th Edition by Merin</title>
		<link>http://ingenre.com/2012/01/captain-z-discusses-dd-5th-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-816</link>
		<dc:creator>Merin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ingenre.com/?p=5039#comment-816</guid>
		<description>Also, I&#039;m not usually one to read Penny Arcade, but I think Tycho is pretty dead-on about this -
http://penny-arcade.com/2012/01/11</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I&#8217;m not usually one to read Penny Arcade, but I think Tycho is pretty dead-on about this -<br />
<a href="http://penny-arcade.com/2012/01/11" rel="nofollow">http://penny-arcade.com/2012/01/11</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Captain Z Discusses D&amp;D 5th Edition by Merin</title>
		<link>http://ingenre.com/2012/01/captain-z-discusses-dd-5th-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-815</link>
		<dc:creator>Merin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 19:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ingenre.com/?p=5039#comment-815</guid>
		<description>I said it before and I stand by it.  I&#039;m not buying it no matter what it is.
The ONE argument that 3rd ED fanatics made about being angry towards 4E that I always understood was the &quot;I bought all these books and now if I want to get new D&amp;D stuff the old books are useless?&quot;

I love 4E... it has it&#039;s issues, I agree, but unlike most people who say such the issues I have with 4E are carry-over from 3E so yeah, there&#039;s that.
I had already stopped buying D&amp;D books due to &quot;too-many&quot; syndrome.  A new edition of rules and such?  No thanks.  It&#039;s too soon (4th, honestly, was probably 2 years too soon) and I&#039;m not spending the money, no matter how good it may be.

Unless the very unlikely scenario occurs in which they actually do create what they are trying to hype, and that is a universal system that works with all the previous editions of D&amp;D.  I have NO CLUE how that&#039;s possible, but I&#039;ll look at what they release.  If it&#039;s compatible with 1E and 2E, I might even give up 4E to go back... or stick with the mountain of 4E books me and my current gaming circle own.

This is a bigger mistake on WotC&#039;s part than 4E could ever have been.  They risk alienating their current base, and with Pathfinder so successful they are NOT going to win back most of their old fans.  It&#039;s a mistake that makes me wonder if they are TRYING to emulate BioWare (or vice-versa) on how to tick off your loyal fanbase the quickest.

Like BioWare, they bad mouth 3E when talking up 4E.  Now that 5E is coming (whatever they want to call it) they are starting to bad mouth 4E as well.  I (naively?) believed them last time that they had realized problems their game system had had.  Now I know it&#039;s a shady marketing tactic - make your customers believe they are holding onto crap and that they NEED to buy the new, improved stuff.

Pass.  Seriously.  I won&#039;t be buying a new edition of D&amp;D until at least 2018 (will it be 6th ED by then?)  If at all - I&#039;m getting old enough and the memory is getting spotty enough that learning ANOTHER set of rules may be out of my comfort zone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I said it before and I stand by it.  I&#8217;m not buying it no matter what it is.<br />
The ONE argument that 3rd ED fanatics made about being angry towards 4E that I always understood was the &#8220;I bought all these books and now if I want to get new D&#038;D stuff the old books are useless?&#8221;</p>
<p>I love 4E&#8230; it has it&#8217;s issues, I agree, but unlike most people who say such the issues I have with 4E are carry-over from 3E so yeah, there&#8217;s that.<br />
I had already stopped buying D&#038;D books due to &#8220;too-many&#8221; syndrome.  A new edition of rules and such?  No thanks.  It&#8217;s too soon (4th, honestly, was probably 2 years too soon) and I&#8217;m not spending the money, no matter how good it may be.</p>
<p>Unless the very unlikely scenario occurs in which they actually do create what they are trying to hype, and that is a universal system that works with all the previous editions of D&#038;D.  I have NO CLUE how that&#8217;s possible, but I&#8217;ll look at what they release.  If it&#8217;s compatible with 1E and 2E, I might even give up 4E to go back&#8230; or stick with the mountain of 4E books me and my current gaming circle own.</p>
<p>This is a bigger mistake on WotC&#8217;s part than 4E could ever have been.  They risk alienating their current base, and with Pathfinder so successful they are NOT going to win back most of their old fans.  It&#8217;s a mistake that makes me wonder if they are TRYING to emulate BioWare (or vice-versa) on how to tick off your loyal fanbase the quickest.</p>
<p>Like BioWare, they bad mouth 3E when talking up 4E.  Now that 5E is coming (whatever they want to call it) they are starting to bad mouth 4E as well.  I (naively?) believed them last time that they had realized problems their game system had had.  Now I know it&#8217;s a shady marketing tactic &#8211; make your customers believe they are holding onto crap and that they NEED to buy the new, improved stuff.</p>
<p>Pass.  Seriously.  I won&#8217;t be buying a new edition of D&#038;D until at least 2018 (will it be 6th ED by then?)  If at all &#8211; I&#8217;m getting old enough and the memory is getting spotty enough that learning ANOTHER set of rules may be out of my comfort zone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Captain Z Discusses D&amp;D 5th Edition by Benton Sartore</title>
		<link>http://ingenre.com/2012/01/captain-z-discusses-dd-5th-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-814</link>
		<dc:creator>Benton Sartore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ingenre.com/?p=5039#comment-814</guid>
		<description>I like 4th Ed. just fine the way it is, but I&#039;m not up in arms about a new edition or anything.  If I had to guess what 5th Ed. looks like, it will probably be something similar to Essentials with less emphasis on powers, an easier multiclassing system (probably something more like 3.5), and more variety within the classes, akin to Pathfinder&#039;s archetypes or some such.

I&#039;m glad for the open playtests, but they&#039;re also the thing that worries me the most, because there&#039;s no way the game will please everybody and I worry it could entrench people into their preferred rules system even more if it backfires too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like 4th Ed. just fine the way it is, but I&#8217;m not up in arms about a new edition or anything.  If I had to guess what 5th Ed. looks like, it will probably be something similar to Essentials with less emphasis on powers, an easier multiclassing system (probably something more like 3.5), and more variety within the classes, akin to Pathfinder&#8217;s archetypes or some such.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad for the open playtests, but they&#8217;re also the thing that worries me the most, because there&#8217;s no way the game will please everybody and I worry it could entrench people into their preferred rules system even more if it backfires too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Long Live the Queen: A Buffy Season 8 Retrospective by Live Through This: Buffy Season 9 (And Angel &#38; Faith)</title>
		<link>http://ingenre.com/2011/02/long-live-the-queen-a-buffy-season-8-retrospective/comment-page-1/#comment-812</link>
		<dc:creator>Live Through This: Buffy Season 9 (And Angel &#38; Faith)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ingenre.com/?p=3031#comment-812</guid>
		<description>[...] At the end of Season 8, Buffy destroyed the Seed of Wonder, the source of all magic in the world, and Season 9 (both the Buffy comic and the companion Angel &amp; Faith) has done a good job so far of developing that darker, unhappier world; the end of magic wasn&#8217;t the end of the adventure, it was the beginning of a whole new set of problems.  Demons are trapped in our world.  Willow is powerless.  The laws of demon physics have warped and contorted.  And most troubling of all, newly sired vampires are now little more than beasts — “zompires,” as Xander so eloquently coined it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] At the end of Season 8, Buffy destroyed the Seed of Wonder, the source of all magic in the world, and Season 9 (both the Buffy comic and the companion Angel &amp; Faith) has done a good job so far of developing that darker, unhappier world; the end of magic wasn&#8217;t the end of the adventure, it was the beginning of a whole new set of problems.  Demons are trapped in our world.  Willow is powerless.  The laws of demon physics have warped and contorted.  And most troubling of all, newly sired vampires are now little more than beasts — “zompires,” as Xander so eloquently coined it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on WotC Confirms New D&amp;D Edition by Merin</title>
		<link>http://ingenre.com/2012/01/wotc-confirms-new-dd-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-809</link>
		<dc:creator>Merin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 21:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ingenre.com/?p=4961#comment-809</guid>
		<description>Not.
Buying.
It.

I gave 4E a chance because my alternatives were 3E, which I hate, and 2E, which it&#039;d be a chore to get enough willing players together to give it a go.  My 2E books were old, so buying new books was fine.

I am NOT buying another edition of D&amp;D, regardless of quality, for at least another five years. 

Screw.
This.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not.<br />
Buying.<br />
It.</p>
<p>I gave 4E a chance because my alternatives were 3E, which I hate, and 2E, which it&#8217;d be a chore to get enough willing players together to give it a go.  My 2E books were old, so buying new books was fine.</p>
<p>I am NOT buying another edition of D&#038;D, regardless of quality, for at least another five years. </p>
<p>Screw.<br />
This.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Benton&#8217;s Best of 2011 by Benton Sartore</title>
		<link>http://ingenre.com/2012/01/bentons-best-of-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-808</link>
		<dc:creator>Benton Sartore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 05:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ingenre.com/?p=4914#comment-808</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve since watched a lot of stuff I missed in 2011 because I got it for Christmas — particularly Arkham City (which was very good) and Captain America (ditto).  Thor didn&#039;t exactly set my world on fire (though I did enjoy it), but I did like The Muppets and X-Men First Class.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve since watched a lot of stuff I missed in 2011 because I got it for Christmas — particularly Arkham City (which was very good) and Captain America (ditto).  Thor didn&#8217;t exactly set my world on fire (though I did enjoy it), but I did like The Muppets and X-Men First Class.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Benton&#8217;s Best of 2011 by Merin</title>
		<link>http://ingenre.com/2012/01/bentons-best-of-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-807</link>
		<dc:creator>Merin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 20:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ingenre.com/?p=4914#comment-807</guid>
		<description>Jiminy Cricket, how could I forget Bioshock Infinite.  Yeah, that&#039;s WAY up at the top of my list as well!

Ken Levine and Irrational never disappoint me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jiminy Cricket, how could I forget Bioshock Infinite.  Yeah, that&#8217;s WAY up at the top of my list as well!</p>
<p>Ken Levine and Irrational never disappoint me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

